![]() |
| Keira Knightley as Sabina Spielrein in A Dangerous Method |
Cross-post by Didion originally published at Feminéma.
I totally get it now.
I’ve never quite understood why Keira Knightley is an A-list
star, nor why she gets such good roles (like Atonement, Pride &
Prejudice, and Never Let Me Go) –
until I saw her in David Cronenberg’s A
Dangerous Method (2011). It always seemed to me she was being cast against
type. Whereas those earlier films insisted she was a quintessential English
rose, as Lizzie Bennet in P&P she
appeared to me more likely to bite one of her co-stars than to to impress
anyone with her fine eyes.
What Cronenberg gets (and I didn’t, till now) is that Knightley’s
angular, toothy, twitchy affect shouldn’t be suppressed but mined instead.
![]() |
| Keira Knightley |
Now that I’ve finally seen A Dangerous Method, I can’t imagine another actor taking on the
role of the hysteric Sabina Spielrein to such effect. Jewish, Russian, fiercely
intelligent and tortured by her inner demons, Sabina is the perfect dark mirror
sister of Jung’s blonde and blue-eyed wife (Sarah Gadon), who always appears
placid, wide-eyed and proper, and sometimes apologizes for errors such as
giving birth to a daughter rather than a son. Now that’s a rose of a girl.
Maybe she seems exaggerated, but Jung’s wife embodies the
self-control and physical containment of their elite class as well as their
whiteness. No wonder Jung (Michael Fassbender) is so thrown by Sabina. For all
her physical contortions, Sabina is also open to change, open to the darkest of
insights. She opens up her mind and her memories to him with stunning
willingness, revealing black thoughts associated with dark sexual urges. The
more she ceases repressing those memories and associations, the more she
reconciles them and begins to heal — and begins to use her quicksilver smarts
in a way that shows her full embrace of the “talking cure”. No wonder she
captivates Jung’s imagination, which is only the beginning of his growing
disloyalty to his wife.
Knightley’s impossible skinniness only enhances her
performance here. Whereas in most other films her body gets presented to us as
yet another ridiculous size-00 slap in the face to the rest of us fat pigs (and
don’t you forget it, Ashley Judd), in A
Dangerous Method her body exemplifies a lifetime of self-punishing
neurosis. There’s nothing more improbable than seeing her heavy dark eyebrows
and her olive skin — and hearing about her sexual arousal via humiliation — all
the while bound up in those cruel corsets and lacy, white, high-necked dresses
that on any other woman would be persuasive signifiers of her chastity.
In fact, I’d go so far as to say that what I found most
impressive about Knightley’s performance was the way she showed how the later,
“healed” Spielrein – the one who no longer screams and juts out her chin — was
a recognizable incarnation of the earlier hysteric. Her clenched and slightly
hunched shoulders, her black looks, her tight mouth. She’s a whirlwind of
intellect and energy, and the performance is brilliant. As the excellent JB
writes over at The Fantom Country,
“Even in relatively calmer moments, she seems trapped inside a state of
ceaseless panic, caught, gasping for air, in the dragnet of some trawler that
never sleeps.”
![]() |
| Keira Knightley |
This is especially important for the contrast between her
corporeal presence versus that of Jung and Freud, who exert an absurd degree of
self-control and containment, like disembodied brains. When she kisses Jung for
the first time, his weak response is to note, “It’s generally thought that the
man should be the one to take the initiative.” When someone refers to the
“darker differences” between the two, we know those differences are both racial
and sexual — and that Spielrein is the dark one, the one whose vagina has needs
and rages, and smells like a real woman’s vagina (thanks to Kartina
Richardson’s terrific piece, “Keira Knightley’s Vagina”). It makes me wish that
Knightley rather than Natalie Portman had appeared as the lead in Black Swan — again, a statement I never
thought I’d make.
![]() |
| Keira Knightley |
Spielrein and Jung’s other patient, Otto Gross (Vincent
Cassel), both profess to a startling optimism about analysis: “Our job is to
make our patients capable of freedom,” Gross pronounces, a sentiment Spielrein
shares but cannot realize. Her own ecstasy peaks as Jung gives her erotic
spankings; clearly, humiliation still retains its primary charge. The film
doesn’t explore the gendered nature of hysteria, which brought so many women
low during those decades a hundred years ago, but it does highlight how one’s
freedom was limited by other cultural boundaries — most notably race. Spielrein
looks genuinely crushed when her new interlocutor, Freud, pushes her down with
the observation, “We’re Jews, Miss Spielrein — and Jews we will always be.”
![]() |
| Viggo Mortensen as Sigmund Freud |
We don’t very often call it hysteria anymore, but we still
see manifestations of inexplicable corporeal neurosis in girls and women that
defy explanation, as in the strangely infectious case in upstate New York this
year. How amazing it would be to find a filmmaker to address the subject. I’ve
always thought that someone could take the 1690s Salem witch hysteria as a case
study, Arthur Miller-style, to try to explore some of the contributing factors
behind such mass outbursts of tics, twitches, and personal misery. And I’d love
to have Knightley involved again, honestly.
People love to talk about the synergy between Cronenberg and
his frequent male lead, Mortensen, as being one of the great director-actor
combinations of the last decade. But now that I’ve seen what Cronenberg got out
of Knightley, I want him to unearth new roles for her instead so we can see
more of what she can really do once she lets go of the English rose routine. I
totally get it now: Knightley can act. And I’m genuinely looking forward to
more of it.
Feminéma is a blog about feminism, cinéma, and popular culture kept by Didion, a university professor in Texas, who celebrates those rare moments when movies display unstereotyped characters and feature female directors and screenwriters behind the scenes. Most of all she just loves film. Take a look at feminema.wordpress.com.







2 comments:
omg thanks for this post. i totally agree. i think this is one of three performances from her that i love. the others are Never Let Me Go and Last Night. many people didn't appreciate this performance, but you brought out some of the best parts about it. also, i thought i was the only one who noticed her twitchiness beforehand lol
Thanks, Candice! And you're right that her terrific performance here is making me think I need to see Never Let Me Go again to reassess. I love it when an actor is willing to let go of the kinds of personae they've taken on in the past in order to strike off in new directions.
Post a Comment