![]() |
| Movie poster for The Kids Are All Right |
I was so excited to see The Kids Are All Right.
I mean a film with not one, but two amazing female leads as well as a
family headed by lesbian parents?? The feminist in me says sign me up!
While it exuded potential, I wasn’t so excited after watching the film.
The Kids Are All Right, directed and co-written by Lisa Cholodenko (Laurel Canyon, High Art)
centers on Annette Bening (Nic) and Julianne Moore (Jules), a loving
married lesbian couple in California who are parents to daughter Joni
and son Laser. Joni is a brilliant student about to embark on college;
Laser is a confused teen experimenting with drugs and yearning for a
male role model. Laser begs Joni, as she’s 18, to contact their
“father,” as both their mothers underwent artificial insemination, Mark
Ruffalo (Paul) who happens to be the sperm donor for both kids. When
Joni and Laser meet Paul, they’re reticent to tell their mothers. Yet
they eventually do all meet. While Jules and Joni are pleased to
connect with him, Laser feels ambivalence towards him and Nic worries
Paul’s arrival will drive a wedge between her and her family.
Complications ensue as Paul becomes ever more entwined in each of their
lives.
This slow-paced, meandering film
possesses some positive traits. The performances, particularly by
Bening and Ruffalo, are where the film shines. Bening radiates as the
rigid and controlling career woman who feels her world spinning out of
control. There’s a beautiful scene, one of my faves in the film, in
which the background sounds of a dinner party fade to a muffled din as
she sits, alone in her pain. Bening perfectly conveys Nic’s
frustrations and emotions. Moore, whom I adore for her chameleon
ability to seamlessly meld into a character (except her horrendous
Boston accent on 30 Rock), while far from her best performance,
does a great job as the flighty free spirit who’s never truly found her
calling in life. Josh Hutcherson who plays Laser is annoying; although
teens often are so perhaps he does succeed! Mia Wasikowska as Joni
gives a solid performance as the teen yearning for freedom. Ruffalo is
fantastic as Paul, the well-intentioned yet fuck-up hipster. He’s a
pathetic character yet oozes charm in every scene, as he strives to find
a meaningful connection. But it’s Nic and Jules’ tender yet struggling
relationship, that elicits the most fascination. With its mix of
bickering and affection, it feels so real. Just as any couple has
problems, so do they. Jules feels she’s not desired anymore and Nic
feels her family slipping through her grasp.
The dialogue is sharp and witty yet
problematic. For what I had hoped would be a feminist film, the script
was littered with assloads of slut-shaming, whore-calling and homophobic
F-word dropping. And while these terms do get tossed around in our
society, no repercussions or backlash existed in the film; as if no
social commentary was being made. Granted, not every film has to make
some grandiose statement. Yet I expected better here, particularly as
it was directed and co-written by a woman. Luckily, it does pass the
Bechdel Test as Nic and Jules often talk to each other about their
marriage or about their children.
Despite the great performances and
(mostly) great dialogue, the film was mired with too many
problems…particularly its plot. If you’ve seen The Kids Are All Right
or read about it, you probably know what I’m talking about: the
affair. One of the women enters into an affair…with Paul. Yep, a
lesbian has an affair with a man. But not just any man…her sperm donor!
As someone who doesn’t consider
themselves straight (but not a lesbian either), I truly believe in the
fluidity of gender and sexuality. I don’t believe in gender binaries,
so I don’t feel that a self-professed lesbian sleeping with a man means
she’s either/or: either a lesbian or straight. Nor do I think it
necessarily makes her bisexual. But why oh christ why did a man have to
be involved?? As it is, according to the Women’s Media Center, men
comprise more than 70% of the speaking roles in films. And while we’re
starting to see gay men and couples in films and on TV shows, it’s even
rarer to see lesbians (as well as bisexual and transgender).
So it pissed me off that a lesbian
couple, shown with so much tenderness and depth, had to have their lives
invaded by a man. Even the porn film Nic and Jules watch during a sex
scene is of two gay men. It’s almost as if Cholodenko is saying all
women crave a penis! Perhaps I wouldn’t be so hard on the film if there
were more movies made about lesbians. But as this is one of the few
films to show a lesbian marriage, I worry that people will judge lesbian
relationships based on how they’re depicted here.
Inspiration for the film came loosely from Cholodenko's life,
who came out as a lesbian when she was 16 years old. As an adult, many
of her lesbian friends were having babies via sperm donors. When
Cholodenko and her wife decided to have a baby, they too sought a sperm donor.
Interestingly, co-writer Stuart Blumberg happened to donate sperm in
college. These two circumstances coalesced, forming the foundation for
the film. Cholodenko also infused the script with anecdotes from her own life, such as the "numb tongue" story of how Jules and Nic meet in the film.
"'That Nic and Jules are a lesbian couple is important to the movie thematically because they are raising a family in an unconventional setting and are more anxious than some parents about how having two moms will affect the mental health of their children. But it could have been the same thing with a divorced couple,' she says. 'I always thought we were making a movie about a family, and the threat to the wholeness of the family. It was not about politics. If there was anything calculated, it was how do we make this movie universal — how do we make this a story about a family?'"
Critics
have lauded the film for its transcendence from an LGBTQ family into a
universal tale about modern families. And that’s one of the components I
applaud; that Cholodenko’s message is not about a lesbian family, but
of a family, period. Yet I can’t escape the feeling of unease, that
critics glossing over the unique experiences and challenges that LGBTQ
parents face feels like a slap in the face at worst and negligent at
best.
While critics and many movie-goers loved The Kids Are All Right, the film infuriated many lesbians due to the affair. And I can't blame them, it pissed me off too. Sheila Lambert at the Examiner writes,
"'Lesbians love it when a married woman has an affair with another woman on film, which is perceived as moving toward authenticity, but we’re not happy seeing a woman in a same-sex marriage have an affair with a man, which to them represents a regression. And raises concerns about whether it adds fuel to the notion that sexual orientation can be changed from gay to straight. Sitting in the audience, I found myself feeling concerned about that as well…'"
Professor Joan Garry at Huffington Post was one of the lesbians angered by the film's plot. She astutely argues,
"'It boils down to this: I'm upset because I believe the takeaway from this film will be that lesbians and the families they create need men to be complete.'"
Our
patriarchal society continually tells women that they need a man; that
their lives aren’t whole or fulfilled without one. But they don’t.
Despite the film’s misguided plot, the crux of the film resides in the
strength of Nic and Jules’ relationship and their love for their kids.
My fave scene and quote in the film is when Nic and Jules attempt to
explain to their kids why families fight. Jules says,
"'Your mom and I are in hell right now and the bottom line is marriage is hard. It’s really fucking hard. Just two people slogging through the shit, year after year, getting older, changing. It's a fucking marathon, okay? So, sometimes, you know, you're together for so long, that you just... You stop seeing the other person. You just see weird projections of your own junk. Instead of talking to each other, you go off the rails and act grubby and make stupid choices, which is what I did. And I feel sick about it because I love you guys, and your mom, and that’s the truth. And sometimes you hurt the ones you love the most, and I don’t know why. You know if I read more Russian novels, then...Anyway…I just wanted to say how sorry I am for what I did. I hope you’ll forgive me eventually…'"
Raw
and real; it felt as if Annette Bening and Julianne Moore were a real
couple fighting to hold onto their family. Usually, you see a film with
two lesbians in an affair for men’s titillation, rarely to convey a
loving, monogamous relationship. Nic and Jules share a flawed yet
devoted marriage, evocative of relationships in real-life. There was
simply no need to bring a man into the picture. I wish the film had
retained its focus on the couple and their family. It’s such a rarity
that we see films featuring lesbian couples let alone two female leads
that I had high hopes for, expecting it to be empowering. Sadly, the
undercurrent of misogynistic language and male-centrism taints
Cholodenko’s potentially beautiful story.
----------
Megan Kearns is a Bitch Flicks Staff Writer. She's a feminist vegan blogger and freelance writer living in Boston. Megan blogs at The Opinioness of the World,
a feminist vegan site she founded in 2010 which focuses on gender
equality and living cruelty-free. She writes about gender and media as a
Regular Blogger at Fem2pt0, a site uniting social issues with women's voices. Her work has also appeared at Arts & Opinion, Feministing’s Community Blog, Italianieuropei, Open Letters Monthly, A Safe World for Women and Women and Hollywood. She
earned her B.A. in Anthropology and Sociology from UMass Amherst and a
Graduate Certificate in Women and Politics and Public Policy from
UMass Boston. You can follow all of Megan's opinionated musings on
Twitter at @OpinionessWorld.

1 comment:
I found the misogynistic undertones to be disturbing. The film also went downhill once the affair was revealed. Whether this is a coincidence is debatable. It is true to form that the women blamed Paul for the affair. Or should I say, held him responsible. The role of the male in this film is reduced to being a sperm donor correctly reveals how most women truly feel about men. The film was about 20 minutes too long as the ending was disjointed and only added to my despair. The fact that the movie was used as a platform to demean men and show how women are unforgiving left this viewer more disappointed than enriched...1 star...barely
Post a Comment