Jeremy Renner and Rachel Weisz in The Bourne Legacy
The division of labor exists with impunity in the fine world
of the Hollywood action movie, a genre that I do occasionally enjoy.
Hollywood’s latest action film, The Bourne Legacy, is a continuation of the
atmospheric, amnesiac thriller that originally starred Matt Damon. The new
version with Jeremy Renner (Hurt Locker) doesn’t stick Renner in as the next
Jason Bourne (thank goodness—this is not Batman or James Bond), but adds a new
super assassin for us to chase throughout the world, while riding some rickety
mode of transportation.
Renner jumps off of buildings, waterfalls, climbs mountains,
wrestles wolves and basically does everything that would ever make you feel
self-conscious about your own athleticism; He is offset by Rachel Weisz as the
brilliant scientist who knows everything about anatomy, psychology, biology,
but can’t really throw a punch.
Enter in the standard action movie plot and character trope:
A very strong, good-looking guy with mad survival skills is thrown together, by
some mutual need, with a beautiful and intelligent, slightly nervous smart girl
who has perfect hair. These two will originally struggle with mistrust and some
playful bickering before realizing their mutual respect and lust and getting
together, thereby becoming the perfect team of strong boy and smart girl.
Some examples to help illustrate my point: The Saint, Batman
Begins, Superman and feel free to just queue up the James Bond music as that’s
the plot for every single Bond movie ever made (although, to be fair, in a Bond
movie one of the girls will turn out to be an evil kickass).
Val Kilmer and Elizabeth Shue in The Saint
I can think of exceptions to this rule, but in those cases
it’s usually the sort of the guy who holds all the chips: Spiderman (let’s be honest
MJ was never particularly bright) but Peter Parker is brilliant and strong,
Ironman (nothing wrong with Pepper Potts, she’s pretty much a layer of good,
uptight, responsibility—girl style), yet Tony Stark is, of course, a genius and
strong (though he has a weak heart so I suppose that equals the field or
something).
The point is not to make you hate your favorite action
movies and neither is this trope all-encompassing; there are dozens of
exceptions and variations of the boy/girl thrown together action plot. Rather,
the point is a much more fundamental question I’ve been considering lately:
inequality in romantic relationships. Now, I’m not complaining about making
women smart in movies, I think it’s great. I mean no one wants to see that
annoying chick in The Princess Bride, Buttercup, who does absolutely nothing
the whole movie but look nice. Female characters who are smart (or who perhaps
represent the tough girl switch where the girl is strong and the boy is smart
like in How to Train your Dragon) are interesting and (somewhat) multi-dimensional, but why does it have to be divided so transparently even?
Contradictions in character are what make characters relate-able and engaging. Again, this is not a campaign for bringing back
Buttercup or making women completely smart and tough all the time in all the
movies, because well, that’s just not good film-making since film is about
people and everyone is different. What I’d just like to see is some variation,
less of an oh-so-obvious split down the middle….perhaps, fewer tropes and more
people? Specifically, I'd like to see some variation in the portrayal of women in action movies. It's a great genre, full of adrenalin and good times, why can't women reflect that while still being original?
Having people be so completely well matched is unrealistic. And
not that a super assassin (who just also happens to be super trustworthy and
great boyfriend material) running all over the world with a sexy scientist is a
realistic situation, but the people in that situation are supposed to be
realistic-like, as is their relationship. Why must it be that either the two
characters hang there in completely balance to each other, ‘I’m smart, I
contribute” and “I’m strong, I contribute” or one is at the top carrying everything,
while the other lags along at the bottom just brushing their hair and making us
sad?
I’ve read a few things that suggest that some people believe
that heroines have overwhelmingly ascended to the top of the action movie pile;
that they’re so cool that mean can’t keep up anymore. Please, just look at this
year's action movie selection to realize that’s not true. But what is true is
that a lot of characters in mainstream action movies are still falling short of
accurate character portrayals and stepping outside of the plot box.
Now, granted, did I enjoy the movie? Yes. Could it have been
better? Yes. Are there examples of interesting, more human based characters in
action movies? Yes, (I actually
think the original Bourne movies do a great job of that). Does Hollywood need
to do a little better in it’s portrayal of women and actually give them a unique
personality? YES.
No comments:
Post a Comment